Smoking
|
||||||||||||
DisclaimerSome of the facts in this example have been fictionalized for instructional purposes. |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Step 1.1 Write a problem statement. |
||||||||||||
Cigarette smoking is the single most preventable cause of premature death in the United States. Each year, more than 400,000 Americans die from cigarette smoking. One in every five deaths in the United States is smoking related (CDC, 1999). Cigarette smoking is also responsible for 85% of all lung cancer deaths and 30% of all cancer deaths. An estimated 21% of all cases of coronary heart disease can be attributed to cigarette smoking. It is a major risk factor for diseases of the heart and blood vessels; for chronic bronchitis and emphysema; for cancers of the lung, larynx, pharynx, oral cavity, esophagus, pancreas, and bladder; and for other problems such as respiratory infections and stomach ulcers. |
||||||||||||
Step 1.2 Assess the problem's relevance to your program. |
||||||||||||
In 1969,
the Office on Smoking and Health (OSH) at CDC was designated as the lead
agency to combat smoking. The mandate responsibilities of OSH included:
|
||||||||||||
Step 1.3 Explore who should be on the planning team and how team members will interact. |
||||||||||||
The planning
team consisted of representatives from a number of different national, state
and local entities. A sample list of planning team members follows:
|
||||||||||||
Step 1.4 Examine and/or conduct necessary research to describe the problem. |
||||||||||||
Data were gathered from tobacco related research that had been completed by states and other government agencies. Tobacco-related market research and Youthstyles data were also used. | ||||||||||||
Step 1.5 Determine and describe distinct subgroups affected by the problem. |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Step 1.6 Write a problem statement for each subgroup you plan to consider further. |
||||||||||||
Subgroup:
age; 8th graders; and 10th graders The majority of daily adult smokers (82%) began smoking before 18 years of age, and more than 3,000 teenagers begin smoking each day (CDC, 1994). Smoking is almost always initiated and established in adolescence. The percentage of teens that smoke continues to rise. Past-month smoking rates among high school students are on the rise, increasing by nearly a third from 27.5% in 1991 to 36.4% in 1997 (CDC, 1998). The increase has been greatest among 8th graders. Nearly two-thirds of the 10th- grade students report having tried cigarettes. More than one-fourth of 10th-grade students report having smoked a cigarette during the preceding month, and nearly one in five reports smoking regularly. Subgroup: retail
associations Subgroup: states
with the highest smoking rates for teens Subgroup: ethnic
groups |
||||||||||||
Step 1.7 Gather information necessary to describe each subproblem defined in new problem statement. |
||||||||||||
Data from the above resources was further examined. | ||||||||||||
Step 1.8 Assess factors and variables that can affect the project's direction. |
||||||||||||
Strengths The country's leaders were very influential in bringing the problem of teen smoking to national attention. The issue was very important for President Clinton and his health advisors. In May 1997, Donna E. Shalala, head of the Department of Health and Human Services, proposed the Secretary's Initiative, a comprehensive program to reduce smoking among teens by 50% in 7 years. Weaknesses Opportunities Vice President Gore announced a national campaign to educate consumers and help retailers prevent illegal sales of tobacco products to teenagers. The potential for partnerships existed with nonprofit organizations already working to combat teen smoking. The American Cancer Society, American Heart Association and the American Lung Association were organizations that served as partners. The CDC, Office on Smoking and Health (OSH) formed relationships with individual state governments to implement tobacco control policies. The state official partners were used to disseminate media campaigns and information at the local level. Threats Of the teens that smoked, 34% said that one of the reasons they began was because cigarette advertising made smoking appealing. Teenagers and young adults proved to be an ever-changing audience. In order to be meaningful to them, agencies constantly had to adapt and modify their interventions. |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Step 2.1 List the direct and indirect causes of each subproblem that may require intervention(s). |
||||||||||||
The
primary factors contributing to the teen smoking problem included:
The primary factors contributing to the retailers selling tobacco to teenagers included:
|
||||||||||||
Step 2.2 Prioritize and select subproblems that need interventions(s). |
||||||||||||
Because
of their relative importance, the factors on which the agency decided to
intervene included:
|
||||||||||||
Step 2.3 Write goals for each subproblem. |
||||||||||||
The
overall goal of the campaign was to significantly decrease smoking rates
among teenagers.
A related goal was to increase the awareness of age-at-sale laws and policies among retailers who sold tobacco products. |
||||||||||||
Step 2.4 Examine relevant theories and best practices for potential intervention(s). |
||||||||||||
The Office
on Smoking and Health (OSH) offered a website with information about theories,
models and best practices (www.cdc.gov/tobacco).
Below is a list of some examples.
Health Communication/Education
Health Policy/Enforcement
|
||||||||||||
Step 2.5 Consider SWOT and ethics of intervention options. |
||||||||||||
Health Communication/Education Strengths
Weaknesses Opportunities Threats Health Policy/Enforcement Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats Ethics |
||||||||||||
Step 2.6 For each subproblem, select the intervention(s) you plan to use. |
||||||||||||
Communication
was a viable strategy for teenagers and retailers for the following reasons:
|
||||||||||||
Step 2.7 Explore additional resources and new partners. |
||||||||||||
Potential
partners came from academia, government agencies, associations, and private
industry, and are listed below:
|
||||||||||||
Step 2.8 Acquire funding and solidify partnerships. |
||||||||||||
External
communication included e-mail, telephone, print, and face-to-face meetings.
A partner update newsletter was used to disseminate any new developments
on the campaign.
Internal communication included e-mail, telephone, print, and face-to-face meetings. Program staff held regularly scheduled meetings. Attendees included the program director, creative director, and other interested agency staff. Partners occasionally participated in the meetings. Agenda and minutes were distributed to staff along with an edited version for partners. |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Step 3.1 For each subproblem, determine if intervention is dominant. |
||||||||||||
Communication
was the dominant intervention.
Teens were important
for direct intervention because studies indicated increasing smoking rates
among high school students. This group was also selected because it was
one of the high priority populations for the President of the United States
and the Office on Smoking and Health (OSH). Adolescence is the time when
most persons begin to smoke. By targeting this age group, there was a
chance to stop the initiation and further development of tobacco addiction. |
||||||||||||
Step 3.2 Determine whether potential audiences contain any subgroups (audience segments). |
||||||||||||
Ways of
segmenting the teenage population included:
Ways of segmenting the retailers included:
|
||||||||||||
Step 3.3 Finalize intended audiences. |
||||||||||||
A primary
target audience for the campaign was the Class of 2000. These students were
chosen because in the 10th grade, nearly two-thirds reported trying cigarettes.
More than one-fourth reported smoking a cigarette during the preceding month
and nearly one in five reported smoking regularly. The Class of 2000 was
a high priority because they were accessible and directly affected by the
problem.
The second primary target audience was retailers who have businesses within one mile of a school where cigarettes could be purchased. The OSH identified senior high school teachers as a potential secondary audience because of their link with the Class of 2000. Teachers were a promising secondary population to target because they spent a substantial amount of time with teenagers and were potential role models. Teachers were also in a good position to enforce no-smoking regulations at school. |
||||||||||||
Step 3.4 Write communication goals for each audience segment. |
||||||||||||
Communication goals were determined as follows:
|
||||||||||||
Step 3.5 Examine and decide on communication-relevant theories and models. |
||||||||||||
Social Marketing and various behavioral science theories, such as Theory of Reasoned Action/Addiction and Stages of Change, were used in smoking interventions. | ||||||||||||
Step 3.6 Undertake formative research. |
||||||||||||
Audience research was completed with those in the target audiences, and characteristic data were gathered from partners. Secondary data was collected from commercial market and health research data. |
||||||||||||
Step 3.7 Write profiles for each audience segment. |
||||||||||||
Below is a profile of the Class of 2000:
Possible settings for reaching the Class of 2000 included:
Below is a profile of retailers:
Settings for reaching retailers included:
Settings for reaching teachers included:
A comprehensive approach was used to communicate with the target audiences. It included interpersonal, small group, organizational, community and mass media communications. Activities included: Interpersonal
Small Group
Organizational
Community
Mass Media
|
||||||||||||
Step 3.8 Rewrite goals as measurable communication objectives. |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Step 3.9 Write creative briefs. |
||||||||||||
Target
Audience - Students Class of 2000 Objective(s) Obstacles
Key Promise Support Statements/Reasons
Why Tone Media Creative Considerations
Target Audience
- Retailers Objective(s) Obstacles
Key Promise Support Statements/Reasons Why
Tone Media |
||||||||||||
Step 3.10 Confirm plans with stakeholders. |
||||||||||||
All communication efforts were discussed with appropriate stakeholders and partners. The formative research results were revealed and the necessity and importance of evaluation was emphasized. Information needs and desires from stakeholders were obtained and approval to continue with the program was given. Furthermore, the campaign timeline was distributed and discussed to ensure timing was realistic and feasible for all involved. |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Step 4.1 Draft timetable, budget, and plan for developing and testing communication mix. |
||||||||||||
The
implementation plan for the campaign incorporated objectives to increase
the number of students who believed smoking made someone less attractive
and the number of retailers who were aware of age-at-sale policy. The budget
and timetable for this intervention were not available.
A Gantt chart was used to keep track of all tasks, persons responsible, and dates for completion. Some examples of tasks included in the Gantt chart were:
|
||||||||||||
Step 4.2 Develop and test creative concepts. |
||||||||||||
For
the smoking campaign, concepts were developed based on the information gathered
on students and retailers. Brief explanations of the concepts follow:
Focus groups were conducted with students and retailers to inform the smoking campaign. The purpose of the focus groups was to obtain feedback about concepts as preliminary ideas to use as a starting point in developing a specific message. |
||||||||||||
Step 4.3 Develop and pretest messages. |
||||||||||||
Informal focus groups were conducted with students and retailers. These results were used to develop the materials and final messages. | ||||||||||||
Step 4.4 Pretest and select settings. |
||||||||||||
Information gathered from the focus groups and marketing data indicated that the settings selected were appropriate for the audiences. | ||||||||||||
Step 4.5 Select, integrate, and test channel-specific communication activities. |
||||||||||||
The Office
on Smoking and Health chose a mass media and interpersonal approach for
the smoking campaign because the combination was best for creating and building
awareness and affecting attitudes. The following materials were developed
as a way of reaching a large audience in various settings through different
media:
The Class of 2000 was targeted through the use of PSAs, a web page, fact sheets and posters. Discussions about the unattractiveness of smoking were also used with the students. The retailers were targeted for awareness of age-at-sale policy with direct mail brochures and ads in trade publications. |
||||||||||||
Step 4.6 Identify and/or develop, pretest, and select materials. |
||||||||||||
Several
types of materials were developed. Examples of a brochure, web page, and
PSA follow:
A series of 40 one-on-one interviews were conducted with Class of 2000 to pretest the web page, radio and television PSA scripts, and storyboards. After showing the web pages, PSA and other materials (posters, fact sheets), the interviewers requested feedback from students on the PSAs and the approach used in the PSAs. In general, the feedback was positive. The PSAs were informative and the message characteristics (style, tone, appeal, source, and channel) were well accepted. A series of 20 one-on-one interviews were conducted with retailers to pretest direct mail brochures and the ads in trade publications. The brochures and ads were informative and well accepted by the retailers. |
||||||||||||
Step 4.7 Decide on roles and responsibilities of staff and partners. |
||||||||||||
After
organizational clearance of messages and materials was obtained, the following
tasks were accomplished:
After the print materials and web page were created and the PSAs duplicated, the campaign kickoff was scheduled. A checklist was developed to keep activities on schedule. Some items from the preparation checklist follow:
|
||||||||||||
Step 4.8 Produce materials for dissemination. |
||||||||||||
After organizational clearance of messages and materials was obtained, the following tasks were accomplished
|
||||||||||||
Step 4.9 Finalize and briefly summarize the communication plan. |
||||||||||||
Cigarette smoking is the single most preventable cause of premature death in the United States, killing more than 400,000 Americans annually. It is also responsible for various cancer deaths and is a major risk factor for numerous diseases of the heart and blood vessels. In an attempt to increase the number of Class of 2000 students who believed that smoking made someone less desirable and attractive, and increase the number of retailers who were aware of the age-at-sale policy regarding tobacco sales to teenagers, a 2-year communication campaign was launched in November 1998. Various community representatives and public and private organizations were involved in this effort. Some of the partners included the American Cancer Society, American Lung Association, American Heart Association, retail associates, teachers, schools, healthcare providers, and the State Department of Education. A Gantt chart was used to keep track of all tasks, persons responsible, and dates for completion. Concepts were developed based on information gathered on students and retailers - the target audiences. Some messages that were portrayed in the concepts included information supporting the fact the smoking harms an individual's appearance (by staining her/his teeth, yellowing their fingers), and that retailers have a responsibility to contribute to the health of teens. The concepts and messages were pretested with the intended audiences and feedback was gathered. Modifications were made where and when necessary so that the messages were accepted by the intended audiences. Settings for exposure varied based on the audience targeted. The communication plan was shared with appropriate stakeholders. These individuals were involved in the creation of the plan, as well as informed with its progress. A mass media and an interpersonal approach was decided upon for the smoking campaign. It was agreed that the combination of these approaches was best for creating and building awareness and affecting attitudes. Numerous materials were developed as a way of reaching large audiences in various settings through different media. A quasi-experimental design was selected because this approach consisted of a pre and post-test intervention. Data analysis and reporting plans were developed and shared with appropriate stakeholders and staff. The communication and evaluation plans were executed, feedback and lessons learned were documented, the program was modified based on feedback received and the above information was disseminated to all involved. |
||||||||||||
Step 4.10 Share and confirm communication plan with appropriate stakeholders. |
||||||||||||
Stakeholders were informed, as well as involved in the communication plan. Meetings were conducted during which program materials, partners, staff, and tracking measures were reiterated and discussed. Attendees were given a preparation checklist for a way to organize completed and "to do" tasks. |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Step 5.1 Identify and engage stakeholders. |
||||||||||||
The partners, United States Congress and CDC were interested in the results of this evaluation. Their particular interests in this intervention were addressed during the evaluation design. | ||||||||||||
Step 5.2 Describe the program. |
||||||||||||
To achieve the above objectives the following intervention was designed. The Office on Smoking and Health chose a mass media and interpersonal approach for the smoking campaign because the combination was best for creating and building awareness and affecting attitudes. The following materials were developed as a way of reaching a large audience in various settings through different media:
|
||||||||||||
Step 5.3 Determine what information stakeholders need and when they need it. |
||||||||||||
The stakeholders were interested in the following information:
|
||||||||||||
Step 5.4 Write intervention standards that correspond with the different types of evaluation. |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Step 5.5 Determine sources and methods that will be used to gather data. |
||||||||||||
The following chart illustrates the various evaluations used during this campaign and sources and methods used to accurately assess campaign data. |
||||||||||||
Step 5.6 Develop an evaluation design. |
||||||||||||
The evaluation design selected for this intervention was a quasi-experimental design, during which a pre and post-test intervention was conducted.
Intervention Components for the student groups: X1: Web page X2: PSAs (radio, television and print) X3: Worksheets Intervention Components for the retailer groups: X1: Direct mail brochures X2: PSAs (radio and television) X3: Print advertisement This quasi-experimental approach involved:
To view additional evaluation information and designs, please see "Resources". |
||||||||||||
Step 5.7 Develop a data analysis and reporting plan. |
||||||||||||
Methods for gathering
and reporting data to stakeholders and campaign team members are noted
below: Data analysis
Reporting
|
||||||||||||
Step 5.8 Formalize agreements and develop an internal and external communication plan. |
||||||||||||
The roles of all involved with evaluation were clarified and formalized. Additionally, the internal and external communication plans were established. Internally, communication was accomplished via inter-office mail, email, telephone, on-site meetings (including all involved office/organization staff and partners) and/or individual meetings as necessary. Externally, communication was accomplished much the same way. Meetings were held at mutually convenient locations and meeting minutes were disseminated to staff and partners. Furthermore, email, direct mail and the telephone were utilized to aid in communication. |
||||||||||||
Step 5.9 Develop an evaluation timetable and budget. |
||||||||||||
This communication campaign was a 2-year project involving the Class of 2000. The campaign was kicked off in November of 1998, and evaluation was completed within 6 months of the end of their senior year. | ||||||||||||
Step 5.10 Summarize the evaluation implementation plan and share it with staff and stakeholders. |
||||||||||||
Staff and stakeholders were given a summarized evaluation plan. It was compiled to inform the aforementioned individuals about how the evaluation activities were to be completed, as well as to answer questions that were previously raised by stakeholders. This document contained information on intervention standards, the budget, a timetable and the evaluation methods and design. |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Step 6.1 Integrate communication and evaluation plans. |
||||||||||||
It was imperative that communication and evaluation were integrated throughout the campaign. To ensure that integration occurred, planning meetings (involving program members, stakeholders and other interested parties) were scheduled and held throughout the campaign for developing programs, monitoring progress, eliciting feedback, making adjustments and keeping communication lines open. |
||||||||||||
Step 6.2 Execute communication and evaluation plans. |
||||||||||||
The communication and evaluation plans were executed. This campaign was launched in November of 1998. Actual implementation lasted approximately 2 years, with evaluation completed in December of 2000. |
||||||||||||
Step 6.3 Manage the communication and evaluation activities. |
||||||||||||
Program management encompassed two areas. The first involved managing the participatory process, which was directed towards continuously developing, implementing, evaluating and refining pieces of the campaign. The second involved the intervention activities themselves, which included various media and interpersonal communication activities. |
||||||||||||
Step 6.4 Document feedback and lessons learned. |
||||||||||||
Some examples of the lessons learned included:
|
||||||||||||
Step 6.5 Modify program components based on evaluation feedback. |
||||||||||||
Certain parts of the campaign were modified based on evaluation feedback. The changes that were made are noted below:
|
||||||||||||
Step 6.6 Disseminate lessons learned and evaluation findings. |
||||||||||||
After the campaign was completed, sponsors, collaborative organizations, and project managers met to discuss lessons learned and a future dissemination plan for project findings. After the meeting, it was decided to distribute executive summary reports to all partners and present key findings at the American Public Health Association conference. A complete report was sent to the CDC. The main goal of the presentations and reports was to present lessons learned from the media campaign, as follows:
For the smoking campaign, several reports and presentations were compiled for different audiences:
|